Thursday, October 18, 2012

Don?t ?Go with the Lesser Evil,? Greens? Jill Stein Warns Progressives

Talking to the Rochester City Newspaper, the Green Party's presidential candidate, Jill Stein, addressed progressive voters, whom she characterized as "people of conscience." The candidate warned that voting for the majority party rather than casting a third-party vote is actually a root cause of the problems currently facing the nation.

Why do progressives hesitate to cast a third-party vote?

Stein asserts that this hesitation is due to "politics of fear." She charges that progressives fed up with the politics of the majority party are marginalized with the threat that a vote for anyone but the backed candidate would result in an election of "a president expanding the war, bailing out Wall Street, attacking immigrant rights, violating our civil liberties." Stein notes that even after not casting a ballot in favor of a third party the last time, the country is grappling with these very issues. "All of that we've gotten by the droves because we've been quiet," she says.

How is Stein getting out her message to voters?

Stein and running mate Cheri Honkala attempted to attend the second presidential debate. As noted on the candidate's campaign website, both politicians were arrested and spent "eight hours handcuffed to a metal chair in a remote police warehouse on Long Island." Stein alleges that the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) bears the blame for harming democracy in America through the exclusion of third-party candidates from the debates.

Is it difficult to overcome the stigma associated with third-party politics?

Stein and others face an uphill battle for mainstream acceptance. Although the Associated Press reports that talk show host Larry King will moderate a third-party presidential debate for those excluded by the CPD, the moderator himself referred to the candidates as politicians who will clearly not win in the election.

Is it true that votes for third party politicians are wasted or cost the majority party the election?

The Cap Times concedes that Al Gore may have lost the 2000 election because liberal voters favored Ralph Nader and did not vote for the Democratic Party. In 2012, voters afraid of handing the election victory to the Republican Party are likely to cast their ballots for President Obama even though they disagree with his politics. "If there was a strong socialist or Green Party I would probably vote for one of those," a voter told the publication.

Jill Stein disagrees. As noted by the Rochester City Newspaper, she does not interpret the 2000 election results to implicate Nader in stealing votes from Gore. Instead, she points out that Nader's support came equally from Republican and Democratic voters, as well as from the independent voting bloc.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/don-t-lesser-evil-greens-jill-stein-warns-222700452.html

richard hamilton richard hamilton howard stern americas got talent china aircraft carrier barbara walters most fascinating person 2011 golden globe nominations los angeles clippers

After Clinton, Obama takes Benghazi responsibility

WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Barack Obama assumed responsibility Tuesday for the deadly terror attack in Libya last month that killed four Americans just hours after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to shoulder the blame for any mistakes the administration made.

"She works for me," the president said in New York in his second presidential debate with Republican challenger Mitt Romney. "I'm the president and I'm always responsible, and that's why nobody's more interested in finding out exactly what happened than I do."

With three weeks before the presidential election, the administration has been unable to put to rest its handling of the Benghazi attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, a State Department computer specialist and two former Navy SEALs who were working as contract security guards.

Obama's statement came amid a spirited back-and-forth with the former Massachusetts governor over the administration's handling of the Benghazi attack, the only significant foreign policy disagreement in an hour-and-a-half exchange dominated by domestic concerns.

Romney challenged the president to explain why U.S officials argued for more than a week after the Sept. 11 assault that it stemmed from a protest against an American-made film ridiculing Islam.

"Whether there was some misleading, or instead whether we just didn't know what happened, you have to ask yourself why didn't we know," Romney said.

"It was very clear this was not a demonstration," he said. "This was an attack by terrorists."

The two also traded jabs on how quickly the president declared Benghazi an act of terror ? with Romney insisting it took two weeks and Obama saying he said as much the day after in an address from the White House Rose Garden. That drew an intervention from the moderator, CNN moderator Candy Crowley appeared to side with Obama.

Before the debate, Clinton tried her best to defuse an issue that is threatening to become a potential obstacle to Obama's re-election campaign.

In a statement that could have long-term ramifications given the persistent speculation that she might run for president in four years' time or stay in public life, Clinton accepted responsibility for the safety of the State Department's staff and diplomatic missions. It was quickly brushed aside by leading Republicans who directed their criticism toward the president.

But her message left several lingering questions unanswered, such as whether the attack on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 occurred because of intelligence failures and why administration officials repeated for so long their account of the anti-American demonstration gone awry.

"I take responsibility," Clinton said, reiterating comments she made in a television interview late Monday. "I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world (at) 275 posts."

Clinton's remarks may have been intentionally vague. Neither in her interviews or her statement does she spell out what exactly she assumes responsibility for, a tactic that may have been employed to avoid culpability for specific failings or tasks strictly outside her control.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Clinton "was extremely clear what she takes responsibility for, which is the operation of this department, all of the men and women here."

The assessment offered nothing definitive about intelligence that may have been used to make security decisions before the attack or the administration's initial accounting of the incident as the byproduct of angry protests. The administration since has referred to a well-coordinated terrorist attack.

The intelligence may have come from the CIA or other agencies beyond Clinton's reach; the post-attack messaging likely would have been coordinated by the administration as a whole ? especially after Romney attacked an independent statement made by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo on the day of the Libya attack.

The Benghazi attack has turned deeply political even within the State Department, with Clinton turning message management over to one of her most trusted aides, Philippe Reines.

Reines, a veteran of Clinton's Senate days and presidential campaign, is a key member of a separate crisis management team that has operated from an office on the ground floor of the department's headquarters. It has focused on preparations for last week's congressional hearing and the department's internal investigation.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner called it "a small group of people helping to get materials together for Congress and to support the process."

Clinton, meanwhile, has been largely shielded from the Benghazi fallout. Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was tasked five days after the attack with presenting it as a protest gone awry, and Clinton conspicuously avoided questioning as that account unraveled.

Even in Clinton's own department, officials have been left in the dark by some of the maneuvering. Some say privately that they see Clinton's gesture less as a case of her falling on her sword for the administration, but presenting herself as the statesman who has accepted her part in any failure. By doing so, they said, she is winning praise from some Republicans and taking herself out of the blame game she said in her statement that she wanted to avoid.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., suggested a more muddied picture, noting that "there are many people that believe that Secretary Clinton may have further political ambitions and this could obviously harm that in one way, but also bring in some additional support, possibly from President Obama who can't run again."

Obama has consistently trumped Romney in polls on foreign policy questions with his frequent reminders to voters that he ended one war in Iraq and was ending another in Afghanistan, and that Osama bin Laden was killed on his watch. But the Benghazi attack has allowed Republicans to widen their criticism of the president, which primarily had been focused on his record on creating jobs and cutting into America's $16 trillion debt.

Outrage has spiked since Vice President Joe Biden's comment in last week's debate with Romney's running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, that "we weren't told" about requests for extra security at the consulate ? just a day after State Department officials told Congress they were aware of, and rejected, several such requests.

Spokesmen for both the State Department and the White House took pains to make clear that Biden's "we" referred to the White House, where such security requests would not go. Clinton backed up Biden's assertion. "The president and the vice president certainly wouldn't be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals," she said.

___

Lee reported from Lima, Peru.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-obama-takes-benghazi-responsibility-033251875--politics.html

happy holidays norad how to carve a turkey how to cook a turkey yorkshire pudding larry the cable guy miracle on 34th street

Al-Qaida, Taliban struggle to justify attack on Malala

AFP / Getty Images

Pakistani students in Lahore, Pakistan hold photographs of child activist Malala Yousufzai during a protest on Tuesday against her attack by the Taliban.

By NBC News staff and Reuters

Updated at 5:40 a.m. ET: The Taliban, al-Qaida and conservative groups in Pakistan have launched an unprecedented effort to justify the attack on teenager Malala Yousufzai and to calm the reaction against her shooting.

Yousufzai, 14, and two other girls were shot Oct. 9 after they left school. The teen, who was shot?in the head and neck, on Monday?was flown to Britain to receive specialist treatment, where doctors said she has every chance of making a "good recovery."

The attack drew widespread protest, with tens of thousands rallying in Karachi, Pakistan?s largest city, on Sunday.

Malala, 14-year-old Pakistani girl shot by Taliban, can recover, UK doctors say


?

?

On Tuesday, al-Qaida's propaganda arm al-Sahab,?issued a three-page communique in Pakistan's tribal areas, laying out a justification for the shooting. It is rare for al-Qaida to feel the need to explain an attack, suggesting that the group feels pressured by the strong backlash against Yousufzai's?shooting."The girl was part of an agenda perpetrated by the (British Broadcasting Corporation) to run an organized campaign against jihad, Islamic Sharia and purdha or veil," a previously unknown commander, Ustad Ahmad Farooq said?in a?statement in Pashto. ?"Now when she was shot, from Pakistan to the United States, everyone is crying about it."?

Thousands rally in Karachi for Malala, 14-year-old Pakistani girl shot by Taliban

Yousufzai came to public notice for writing a blog supporting the schooling for girls and women for the BBC. ?Jihad refers to a religious struggle, which a minority of Muslims interpret as an armed fight against the enemies of Islam. ?

The statement, which asked why NGOs and others decried Malala's shooting but ignored abuses and killings by the American and Pakistani governments,?came on the same day that Taliban insurgents said Yousufzai deserved to die because she had spoken out against the group and praised President Barack Obama.

Taliban justified the attack by describing Yousufzai as a "spy of the West." The Taliban denied that they targeted the teen?for advocating education for girls and said that they would again try to kill her if she survived last week's attack.

"For this espionage, infidels gave her awards and rewards. And Islam orders killing of those who are spying for enemies," the group said in a statement.

"We did not attack her for raising voice for education. We targeted her for opposing mujahedeen and their war. Shariah (Islamic law) says that even a child can be killed if he is propagating against Islam."

Over the weekend, conservative Pakistani politician Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who originally spoke out against the demonstrators, softened his stance, saying that he condemned the attack on "our daughter." ?

As doctors debated whether to send Malala Yousafzai abroad for care, thousands rallied in her name, including hundreds of schoolgirls who gathered in Afghanistan. NBC's Amna Nawaz reports.

However, he suggested that other leaders were trying to gain "political mileage" with this issue,?according to an article in Pakistan's Dawn newspaper.

$1 million bounty
On Tuesday, Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik visited Kainat Riaz, one of the girls injured during the attack on Yousufzai, according to Eurovision News Exchanges.?

Shazia, another schoolgirl, also was shot but survived.?Malik announced a $1 million bounty for Pakistani Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan and offered a pardon to the organization's leader, Hakimullah Mehsud, if he renounced terrorism.

"I want to tell Hakimullah Mehsud and his comrades: 'Renounce terrorism,'" Malik said, according to Eurovision. "I will announce an all-out pardon to you on behalf of the government. If you decide to renounce terrorism, no matter in which part of Pakistan or FATA [federally administered tribal areas], I will come to you all alone. Stand with me and renounce terrorism. Ask forgiveness of the nation. Ask forgiveness from Allah. Maybe the nation will forgive you. And Allah will forgive you," Malik said.

Yousufzai began standing up to the Pakistani Taliban when she was 11, when the Islamabad government had effectively ceded control of the Swat Valley, where she lives, to the militants.

The attack was the culmination of years of campaigning that had pitted the girl against one of Pakistan's most ruthless Taliban commanders, Maulana Fazlullah.

Tight security for teen
Overnight on Monday, two people wanting to visit the teen in the Birmingham hospital where she is receiving treatment were turned away, the hospital and police said.

"They were stopped in a public area of the hospital and questioned by police, who recorded their details and advised the pair that they would not be allowed to see her," West Midlands Police said in a statement, describing them as "well-wishers."

Authorities are highly sensitive about Yousufzai's security given the Taliban's recent threats.

The special hospital unit where she is receiving care?has treated hundreds of soldiers wounded in Afghanistan.

NBC News producers and Reuters contributed to this report.

Shakil Adil / AP

Fourteen-year-old Malala Yousufzai was shot by the Taliban on Tuesday for speaking out against the militants and promoting education for girls. Doctors reported Saturday Yousufzai moved her hands and feet.

More world stories from NBC News:

Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Source: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/16/14479572-spy-of-the-west-al-qaida-taliban-struggle-to-justify-attack-on-pakistani-teen?lite

1000 words ron white ron white buckyballs buckyballs awake mario batali

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Apple?s Total Smartphone Web Traffic Share Climbs To 46% With iPhone 5, Samsung Trails At 17%

Web Traffic Share by Mobile PhoneApple's web traffic share among mobile devices is huge, according to new numbers from Chitika. The online ad network is seeing 43 percent of smartphone web usage coming through iPhones up to the 4S, plus another 3 percent from the iPhone 5 alone. By contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S III is driving 2 percent of mobile web traffic on its network, combined with 15 percent across all other Samsung mobile devices.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/bNoG2UnWf_o/

pecan pie the hobbit trailer red velvet cake recipe josh krajcik porphyria cinnamon rolls krampus

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Tokyoflash hides the time inside the Kisai Maze watch for you to find (video)

Image

Want a watch that prevents passers-by from checking the time on your dime? Buy a Tokyoflash. The company's latest timepiece is the Kisai Maze, which hides the info in the negative space of a maze that's only readable with some practice. Available in stainless steel or IP Black, there's an EL backlight to let you annoy the elderly at night and you can watch it being demonstrated after the break. If you snap one up in the next 48 hours, it'll cost $99 (€77, £61), but hurry, because after Thursday morning the price leaps to $139 (€108, £86) -- so now's the time to learn how to be ruthlessly punctual.

Continue reading Tokyoflash hides the time inside the Kisai Maze watch for you to find (video)

Filed under:

Tokyoflash hides the time inside the Kisai Maze watch for you to find (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/16/tokyoflash-kisai-maze/

lehigh walking dead season finale matt flynn denver news frozen planet creighton new smyrna beach

Spain's Q3 GDP similar to Q2: economy minister

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"2145892301","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-2142713940", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-2142713940", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "2145892301", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "2145892301" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

Lithuanians sway toward opposition populists, Social Democrats in hope to end economic woes

VILNIUS, Lithuania - Lithuanians exasperated with economic hardship were poised to hand a stunning victory to a populist party led by a disgraced Russia-born millionaire, early results and an exit poll after Sunday's election show, setting the stage for a coalition with an impeached president and Social Democrats.

The opposition Labor Party, led by Viktor Uspaskich, a man widely known as the "pickle king" for having made his fortune selling jarred pickles, was leading with 26 per cent of the vote after more than 37 per cent of precincts counted.

The Social Democrats, also in the opposition, were second with 19 per cent. Order and Justice, a populist party led by Rolandas Paksas, who as president was impeached in 2004 for violating the Constitution and abuse of office, was fourth with 9 per cent.

All three parties campaigned on strident criticism of the ruling conservative coalition that took office four years ago at the start of Lithuania's debilitating economic crisis and was forced to raise taxes and cut expenses to ward off bankruptcy ? austerity measures that provoked a voter backlash.

Leaders of the three opposition parties were meeting early Monday to hash over the broad outlines of an agreement that could possibly lead to a new government coalition.

However, only half the seats in the 141-member Parliament are determined by party lists, while the other half consists of single-mandates, many of which will require a run-off ballot in two weeks. Only then will a clear picture of who could form the next government emerge.

Regardless, a Labor Party victory in the party-list phase would signify a tremendous comeback for Uspaskich, a member of the European Parliament who is still under investigation in Lithuania for allegedly fraudulent party finance operations. In 2006 he was forced to resign as economy minister for a conflict-of-interest case with Russia and suspicions about a faked diploma from a Moscow-based institute.

Even if Uspaskich's party wins the greatest number of seats in the 141-member Parliament, it is far from certain that he would get the nod for prime minister, since President Dalia Grybauskaite, whose duty is to appoint the head of government, has expressed deep reservations about Uspaskich's integrity.

The conservative Homeland Union led by Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius was third in the ongoing vote count with some 10.6 per cent support.

Lithuania, which is just emerging from the economic crisis, is still beset with high unemployment ? over 13 per cent ? and falling living standards due in large part to higher energy costs. Tens of thousands have left the country to find jobs elsewhere in Europe.

Lithuanians also voted in a referendum on whether to build a new nuclear power plant, which the ruling coalition claims will help establish the country's energy independence.

Opposition lawmakers, including the Social Democrats, have said the approximate $6 billion project is too expensive for the country of 3 million people.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/lithuanians-sway-toward-opposition-populists-social-democrats-hope-002028018.html

occupy oakland morgellons disease arik armstead sag awards red carpet torrey pines nhl all star game 2012 pollyanna